2016 Annual Meeting: http://www.aaoms.org/meetings-exhibitions/annual-meeting/98th-annual-meeting/

Subgaleal Hematoma From Hair-Combing

Jordan C. Baker DDS Milwaukee, WI, USA
Kyle D. Smith DDS Milwaukee, WI, USA
Anish Gupta DDS Milwaukee, WI, USA
Subgaleal hematomas have been reported to occur in the pediatric population particularly in neonates with incidence ranging from 4 to 59 per 10,000 births1. Subgaleal hematoma occurrence beyond the neonatal period is most often associated with head trauma involving tangential or radial forces applied to the scalp in which emissary veins are ruptured 2,3. Children are predisposed to subgaleal bleeding due to a thinner scalp and more vascular subaponeurotic space than adults 4. A review of PubMed illustrated the rarity of subgaleal hematomas as only 12 cases were reported3,5,6,7,8,9,10,11,12. Subgaleal hematoma was believed to result from hair-pull for the following reasons: the presence of thick hair that is difficult to pull, easily disrupted galeal-pericranial attachment, normal results of coagulopathy work-up, and no evidence of abuse or trauma5.

We report on a case of a 14-year-old male who presented to the emergency room with pain and swelling in the scalp of six days duration. Computed tomographic imaging revealed a 10.5 cm x 8.25 cm x 1.25 cm right frontotemporoparietal subgaleal hematoma. Following a thorough evaluation of the patient’s history—with no evidence of abuse or trauma—a detailed physical exam, and a normal hematology work-up, the swelling was determined to be secondary to hair-combing. The hematoma was drained three times: first, via an initial aspiration with drain and compression dressing application yielding 200cc of non-coagulated blood; second, via surgical evacuation; third, via repeat aspiration with compression dressing placement. Given multiple recurrences, a repeat CT head without contrast was obtained and a coronal incision was planned in the operating room for definitive treatment; however, when the patient presented for the operation, the hematoma had resolved. The patient has since failed to follow-up.

Subgaleal hematomas are rare and present a challenge to diagnose and treat. They are most often seen in the neonatal or pediatric populations secondary to vacuum-assisted births, or they have been associated with trauma, abuse, or coagulopathies9,10,11. Subgaleal hematoma from hair-combing however, is particularly rare. Hematologic disorders need to be ruled-out and a thorough history, physical examination, and diagnostic imaging are paramount for proper diagnosis and treatment planning.

References:

1. Amar PA, et. al. (2003) Neonatal subgaleal hematoma causing brain compression: report of two cases and review of the literature. Neurosurgery. 25:1470–1474.

2. Slap, F.; et. al. Late onset subgaleal hemorrhage infection with Streptococcus pneumoniae? Eur J Pediatr. (2009) 168:647–650.

3. Vu, Tien T, et. al. Hematoma From Hair Braiding: Case Report and Literature Review. Pediatric Emerg Care. Dec 2004; 20(12): 821-823.

4. Adeloye A, Odeku EL. Subgaleal hematoma in head injuries. Int Surg. 1975;60(5):263-265.

5. Falvo, CE, et. al. Subgaleal Hematoma from Hair Combing. Pediatrics.1981: 68 (4), 583-584.

6. Hirosuke Fujisawa, H., et.al. A marked exophthalmos and corneal ulceration caused by delayed massive expansion of a subgaleal hematoma. Childs Nerv Syst. (2005) 21: 489–492.

7. Yip, CC., et.al. Proptosis After Hair Pulling. Ophthal Plast Reconstr Surg, vol. 19, No. 2, 2003.

8. Madhu SV, Agarwal S. Subgaleal hematoma following hair pulling. J Assoc Physicians India.1990 Dec; 38(12):955.

9. Kim D, Taragin B. Subgaleal hematoma presenting as a manifestation of Factor XIII deficiency. Pediatr Radiol.2009 Jun;39(6):622-4.

10. Onyeama CO, et. al. Subgaleal hematoma secondary to hair braiding in a 31-month-old child. Pediatr Emerg Care.2009 Jan;25(1):40-1.

11. Seifert D, Püschel K. Subgaleal hematoma in child abuse. Forensic Sci Int.2006 Mar 10;157(2-3):131-3.

12. Hamlin, H. and Scott, M. Subgaleal hematoma caused by hair pull. JAMA. 1968 Jul 29; 205(5):314.