Comparative Study between Centerline and Straight-Line Measurement of the External Carotid Artery Length
A multislice CT scanner (Aquilion 64; Toshiba Medical Systems, Tokyo, Japan) with 0.5-mm × 64-slice collimation was used for scanning CTA image. Twenty patients who were scanned by CTA (pre-treatment for oral cancer) were selected at random and forty arteries were analyzed. The segmentation procedure (binary image processing of CTA images) was carried out using Mimics (Materialize, Leuven, Belgium). CA and maxillofacial surface rendering bone models were reconstructed by the previously reported method [2]. The CA centerlines were extracted automatically by Mimics.
The fiducial bifurcation points were as follows; vA: superior thyroid artery via common carotid artery (CCA), vB: internal carotid artery and ECA via CCA, vC: lingual artery via ECA, vD: facial artery via ECA, vE: occipital artery via ECA, vF: maxillary artery via ECA.
In addition, F-H plane model (box-shaped surface rendering model) was created and its size was 250 × 250 × 1 mm. Straight-line between F-H plane and CA bifurcation point was measured as follows: First, position coordinates of three points on underside of F-H plane were measured at random. The coefficients a, b, c, d of F-H plane equation (ax+by+cz+d=0) were calculated by these position coordinates. Next, position coordinates A (x1, y1, z1) of bifurcation point were measured using the extracted centerline. Finally, straight-line lengths h (perpendicular to F-H plane) were calculated by equation (h=(ax1+by1+cz1+d)(a2+b2+c2)-1/2 ). Finally, centerlines length of ECA between F-H plane and bifurcation point were compared to straight-lines length.
The straight-line (a) and centreline (b) lengths from F-H plane to each bifurcation points (vA|vF) were indicated as follows [mean±std. (mm)].vA; (a)81.1±9.8, (b)113.6±11.6, vB; (a)84.1±12.4, (b)117.8±13.3, vC; (a)67.0±7.9, (b)98.1±10.4, vD; (a)59.4±8.6, (b)89.6±12.4, vE; (a)61.3±8.8, (b)91.7±12.3, vF; (a)26.7±3.4, (b)39.3±7.2.
We proved that the centerlines length of ECA were about 34 mm longer than the straight-lines length (perpendicular to F-H plane). This study did not show a strong correlation between centerline and straight-lines length. Therefore, surgeons should measure the three-dimensional ECA length (centerline length) before catheterization.
[1] Wang, J., Ohya, T., Liao, H., Sakuma, I., Wang, T., Tohnai, I, and Iwai, T (2011) Intravascular catheter navigation using path planning and virtual visual feedback for oral cancer treatment. The International Journal of Medical Robotics and Computer Assisted Surgery 7 (2):214-224.
[2] Ohya, T., Iwai, T., Luan, K., Kato, T., Liao, H., Kobayashi, E., Mitsudo, K., Fuwa,N., Kohno, R., Sakuma, I, and Tohnai, I (2012) Analysis of carotid artery deformation in different head and neck positions for maxillofacial catheter navigation in advanced oral cancer treatment. Biomed Eng Online 11:65.